Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Tracks take Triple Crown marketing into own hands


Horse racing fans played witness to a birth and a funeral last week when MI Developments Inc. announced a $5.5-million bonus plan for the connections of a horse who sweeps a pair of designated prep races at its winter-spring tracks and then wins the Preakness Stakes (G1).

It was the birth of a great idea that shows the "new" racetrack operator's commitment to growing its core business, but it may be the death of the Triple Crown series as we know it.

Beginning in 1986, Triple Crown Productions marketed the series of races by gathering common nominations for all three races—the Kentucky Derby (G1), Preakness, and Belmont Stakes (G1)—negotiating a television contract, and helping to arrange a bonus for sweeping the series.

The three companies that own the races—Churchill Downs Inc., MI Developments, and New York Racing Association—still accept a common nomination, but their joint efforts for TV ended in 2004 and there has been no umbrella sponsor since Visa Inc. left in ’05.

MI Developments’ new Preakness 5.5 promotion is a larger step toward an “each track for itself” mentality.

In talking to Thoroughbred Times about the promotion, MI Developments Vice Chairman Dennis Mills acknowledged that the Kentucky Derby is the sport’s most valuable property and that his company was trying to leverage its Preakness by tying the $5.5-million bonus not only to its race but also to traditional Kentucky Derby prep races.

MI Developments increased the purse of both the Santa Anita (G1) and Florida (G1) Derbys to $1-million, which makes them not only among the most lucrative races in the country but also key races on the Kentucky Derby trail because that race’s 20 starters are determined by earnings in graded stakes.

Churchill last year paid General Electric Co.'s NBC to televise key Derby preps, which it will likely do again in 2011. That series probably will include the Louisiana Derby (G2), which Churchill hosts at its Fair Grounds in New Orleans and boosted to $1-million for next year. NBC had televised all three Triple Crown races from 2001 through '04, when NYRA made its own deal with Disney Corp.’s ABC that expired this year as did NBC’s deal with the Derby and Preakness, so all three races are again on the table.

Churchill President Bob Evans has said that he would like to see all three races on one network. NYRA President Charles Hayward has said that he likes the Belmont’s deal with Disney because of the ABC-ESPN synergy but that he expects pressure for NYRA to sign the Belmont on as part of the series on one network.

Ed Seigenfeld, who served as executive director of Triple Crown Productions through 2009, had said numerous times after NYRA negotiated its own television deal for the Belmont that the splintered coverage of the series was a major hurdle toward bringing back an umbrella sponsor such as Chrysler Group or Visa.

That both MI Developments and Churchill have seemed to prefer marketing their own race to marketing the series should be of most concern to NYRA, since the Belmont is marooned when there is no Triple Crown on the line and especially so when neither the Derby nor Preakness winner competes in the race, as was the case this year.

What is interesting about NYRA seemingly being left out of the television and marketing, though, is that it will soon be flush with cash thanks to video lottery terminals at Aqueduct, and there is no reason not to think that it will not offer big purses for races such as the Gotham Stakes (G3), Wood Memorial Stakes (G1), Belmont, Travers Stakes (G1), and who knows what else.

As races before the Kentucky Derby, the Gotham and Wood would still be preps for the first Saturday in May while still potentially being a part of a Belmont bonus scheme similar to what MI Developments is offering.

And from a marketing perspective, the Preakness 5.5 is a winner because it gives the Maryland Jockey Club something more than just the Derby winner to market.

In the past, January through April is all about the Derby, but offering $5.5-million to the winners of certain races and the Preakness puts the latter race more in the conversation.

Up to five horses (assuming no dead heats) could be in the Santa Anita and Florida Derbys with a chance at the bonus, and the perfect storm for the Preakness would be if the race included two horses with a chance at the bonus plus the Derby winner. NBC could have a field day with the “Derby winner to try to deny $5-million bonus” and “$5-million bonus could derail Triple Crown attempt” storylines.

What Churchill and MI Developments have done in the past year to bolster their properties is a refreshing example of marketing their core business, but the Triple Crown as a joint property should not be ignored either.

8 soothsayers:

  1. what a shit show. I could say a lot more, but that sums it up for me.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, it's a pretty safe bet--they insure such "bonuses" with companies and it's pretty high odds that it won't happen therefore won't have to be paid out. If we'd had a Triple Crown winner or two or three since 1978, then it'd be a much scarier, pricier gamble. I woudldn't worry about it.

    WinngColrz
    ReplyDelete
  3. In a few years, once NYRA gets some of that slot money pouring in, I can see them jumping the purse for the Belmont to about $3 million.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Barbaro would have been going for a $5.5 mil bonus in 2006 had it been in place then. Imagine if he had skipped the Derby to concentrate on the Preakness.
    Eskendereya won the Fountain of Youth and then won the Wood, but would have run in the Florida Derby had it been five weeks (which it returns to next year). I wonder how hard he would have been worked on that balky ankle in April if there was a $5.5 million bonus waiting in Baltimore.
    You are correct, Ed. The Triple Crown as a property is headed for another Spend A Buck moment in the not-to-distant future. There doesn't appear to be a spirit among the three companies to "save" the Crown when that happens.
    ReplyDelete
  5. Posted this at Railbird, too:

    re the Magna bonus: In 1985, there was a $2 million bonus offered by Robert Brennan to the winner of the Cherry Hill Mile, Garden Stakes Stakes, the Jersey Derby, AND the Kentucky Derby. The very easy Kentucky Derby winner, Spend a Buck, bypassed the Preakness to run in the rich Jersey Derby ($600,000 purse) and won the bonus. The Triple Crown was in danger was the chorus, but, of course, no such thing happened.

    Oaklawn Park, of course, had the $5 million bonus for sweeping the Rebel, Arkansas Derby, and Kentucky Derby (which Smarty Jones did), but that didn’t interfere with the Triple Crown, as Brennan’s and Stronach’s races did and can do.
    ReplyDelete
  6. Sid: saying "The Triple Crown was in danger was the chorus, but of course no such thing happened" without mentioning that THE VERY NEXT YEAR Triple Crown Productions was formed does a disservice to the discussion, no?

    The tracks marketing the series together helped keep the series in tact.

    There will always be interest in sweeping all three races, but other than from that standpoint, the series is woefully undermarketed. This year's Belmont was easily the least compelling race of the three.
    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, Ed, no doubt about that, but I was just pointing that though that particular year Spend a Buck skipped an attempt at the TC, the tradition that binds the three tracks together---and the machinations that keep them functioning to protect their turf---always seems to win out. You are absolutely correct that the series is "woefully" undermarketed, and there will always be challenges to the Triple Crown races from interlopers and entreprteneurs, such as the Brennans and the Stronachs of the world, BUT from the value of prestige, stud value, and glamour, even an undermarketed Triple Crown, though I hate to say it, carries larger clout than money can buy.
    ReplyDelete
  8. Sorry for the diatribe...

    It proves the point that people in charge of racing are f'ing morons. The Triple Crown is the ONLY thing that works in horse racing. It's the ONLY thing that catches the attention of the casual fan, and yet these morons are going to piss all over it for reasons that allude me. 5.5? who the F cares? I'll pay attention but it will not move me to bet 1 penny more on any of those races, and if they do end up rendering the TC pointless they'll be costing themselves a lot more in handle than this stupid promotion could ever hope to achieve.

    Am i the only one wishing for a plague that forces all these goons to retire and just let go.
    ReplyDelete